“Racism” or Survival: Andrew Torba’s Take on In-Group Preference

In the digital age, where the battleground of ideas often takes the form of tweets and viral posts, Andrew Torba, the founder of Gab, has once again thrown down the gauntlet with a message that cuts straight through the veil of political correctness.

In the aftermath of Elon Musk’s petulant tantrum regarding H-1B visas, Torba’s latest X post tackles the contentious topic of “racism,” but not in the way you might expect.

Torba argues that the term has been weaponized, stripped of its original meaning to serve as a cudgel against whites, while other ethnic groups engage in the same behavior—labeled in-group preference—without the same societal condemnation.

Torba’s critique is not just a lament; it’s a call to arms for those he believes are ensnared in what he calls the “liberal mind prison.” He points out the hypocrisy in how in-group preference is perceived and practiced across different racial lines. For Torba, the issue isn’t about promoting division or fostering animosity but about recognizing a basic human instinct for self-preservation and community cohesion. He challenges the narrative that in-group preference among whites is inherently malicious, contrasting it with the acceptance of such preferences in other communities.

The crux of Torba’s message is a stark choice: embrace what society labels as “racism” in the form of in-group preference, or face replacement. He frames this not as an endorsement of hatred but as a fundamental survival strategy. In a world where cultural debates can dictate the future of nations, Torba’s words are a provocative reminder of the ongoing dialogue about identity, race, and the right to self-determination.

–Wolfhsead


What follows is the full text of Andrew Torba’s Tweet on X:

“Some of you still don’t get it and are locked in the liberal mind prison where their magic spell words continue to paralyze you from thinking clearly. Allow me to break it down for you simply:

“The term “racism” has been weaponized against White people, stripping it of its original meaning. In its contemporary usage, “racism” is essentially synonymous with in-group preference.

“Every other race and ethnic group on the planet engages in in-group preference, favoring their own kind in various aspects of life such as employment, neighborhoods, social circles, mate selection, and yes—even the church they attend.

“And there is nothing wrong with this, I have no problem with other races having an in-group preference. This was the norm for every racial group for all of human history until about five minutes ago when Whites decided to embrace suicidal levels of altruism and atomized individualism.

“My problem is with the double standard.

“When Whites exhibit the same in-group preference, they are labeled as “racists” or “White supremacists.” This distortion of the term “racism” is deeply deceptive. It implies that Whites having in-group preference is inherently malicious and irrational, driven solely by a hatred of other races.

“This is a gross mischaracterization. In-group preference does not necessitate a venomous animosity towards other races simply because of their ancestry. It is a natural human tendency that has served to maintain the integrity and cohesion of various communities throughout time.

“The true significance of in-group preference lies in its role as a mechanism for survival and prosperity. When Whites fail to prioritize their own group interests, they leave themselves vulnerable to displacement, replacement, and eventual destruction at the hands of other groups that have no qualms about pursuing their own self-interests.

“It is essential for Whites to recognize and understand the importance of in-group preference, not to foster hate or animosity towards other races, but to ensure the continued survival and flourishing of our people and nations.

“We can, should, and have every right to embrace and advocate for our own interests while coexisting peacefully with other groups. This is not a call for hatred or division, but rather a plea for the recognition of the basic human right to self-preservation and the pursuit of a prosperous future for one’s own people.

“So make the choice, and it is absolutely a binary choice—you can be “racist” or you can be replaced by those who are.”


Latest Comments

  1. AnonEntity December 29, 2024
  2. Wolfshead December 29, 2024
  3. Allwynd December 30, 2024

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.